Cefepime-Taniborbactam in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are global health threats. Cefepime-taniborbactam is an investigational ß-lactam and ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa expressing serine and metallo-ß-lactamases. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned hospitalized adults with complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), including acute pyelonephritis, in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous cefepime-taniborbactam (2.5 g) or meropenem (1 g) every 8 hours for 7 days; this duration could be extended up to 14 days in case of bacteremia. The primary outcome was both microbiologic and clinical success (composite success) on trial days 19 to 23 in the microbiologic intention-to-treat (microITT) population (patients who had a qualifying gram-negative pathogen against which both study drugs were active). A prespecified superiority analysis of the primary outcome was performed after confirmation of noninferiority. RESULTS: Of the 661 patients who underwent randomization, 436 (66.0%) were included in the microITT population. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 years, and 38.1% were 65 years of age or older. In the microITT population, 57.8% of the patients had complicated UTI, 42.2% had acute pyelonephritis, and 13.1% had bacteremia. Composite success occurred in 207 of 293 patients (70.6%) in the cefepime-taniborbactam group and in 83 of 143 patients (58.0%) in the meropenem group. Cefepime-taniborbactam was superior to meropenem regarding the primary outcome (treatment difference, 12.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 22.2; P = 0.009). Differences in treatment response were sustained at late follow-up (trial days 28 to 35), when cefepime-taniborbactam had higher composite success and clinical success. Adverse events occurred in 35.5% and 29.0% of patients in the cefepime-taniborbactam group and the meropenem group, respectively, with headache, diarrhea, constipation, hypertension, and nausea the most frequently reported; the frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime-taniborbactam was superior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated UTI that included acute pyelonephritis, with a safety profile similar to that of meropenem. (Funded by Venatorx Pharmaceuticals and others; CERTAIN-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03840148.).

Comparison of three doses of amikacin on alternate days with a daily dose of meropenem during the same period for the treatment of urinary tract infection with E. coli: a double-blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are very common infections in humans, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the commonest pathogen leading to UTIs. The generation of beta-lactamase enzymes in this bacterium results in its resistance against many antibiotics. This study compares three doses of amikacin on alternate days with a daily dose of meropenem in the same period for the treatment of UTIs with E. coli in a double-blind clinical trial. METHODS: The current double-blind clinical trial compares three doses of amikacin on alternate days with a daily dose of meropenem in the same period for the treatment of UTIs with E. coli. The patients were assigned to two groups: Intervention (receiving a single dose of amikacin once a day at 48-h intervals for a week, three doses) and control (receiving meropenem for 1/TDS for a week). RESULTS: The E. coli infection frequency was 61 (21 cases of non-ESBL and 40 cases of ESBL-positive infections) and the frequency of the other infections was 52 (46%). In the patients with ESBL E. coli infection, ciprofloxacin (21; 70%) showed the highest antibiotic resistance, and nitrofurantoin (33; 91.7%) showed the highest sensitivity. The baseline variables between the control and intervention groups indicated no significant difference (p > 0.05). The frequency of signs and symptoms showed no significant difference between the amikacin and meropenem groups in the first 24 h and the first week. In the second week of follow-up, no clinical signs or symptoms were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that treatment with amikacin, 1 g q48h, for one week (three doses) has the same result as meropenem, 1 g q8h, for one week (21 doses). The results are the same for the treatment of UTIs with ESBL positive and ESBL negative. Amikacin can be used once every 48 h to treat UTIs, is less expensive and can be administered on an outpatient basis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with ID number: IRCT20170417033483N2 on the date 2018-02-13.

Chemical stability and physical compatibility of meropenem in admixtures for continuous and extended intravenous infusions / Estabilidad química y compatibilidad física de meropenem en mezclas para infusión intravenosa continua y extendida

Introduction: Prolonged intravenous infusion of beta-lactams increase the clinical cure rate compared to conventional administration in critical or septic patients. This study aimed to determine chemical stability and physical compatibility of meropenem at conditions used in clinical practice to evaluate the stability of the preparation during its administration and the possibility of anticipated preparation. Methods: Admixtures in study were: (i) meropenem 6g in 0.9% sodium chloride (NS) in infusor of 2mL/h 50mL or 10mL/h 240mL; (ii) meropenem 1 or 2g in NS in infusion bag of 250mL. Temperatures of study were: (i) infusor: 4.5°C, 32°C or 12h at 4.5°C followed by 32°C; (ii) Infusion bag: 4.5°C, 24.5°C or 6h at 4.5°C followed by 24.5°C. Time of study was 5–6 days in infusor and 1 day in infusion bag. Chemical stability was evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography and physical compatibility by measuring pH and visual inspection. Results: Chemical stability and physical compatibility of meropenem in admixtures in infusors were reduced at high meropenem concentration and high temperature. Admixtures in infusion bag show chemical stability and physical compatibility for at least 1 day. Conclusion: Administration of meropenem 6g in infusion of 24h in 240mL of 0.9% NaCl in infusor of 10mL/h could be possible if the admixture is infused at 4.5°C. Extended infusion of meropenem 1 or 2g in 0.9% NaCl in infusion bag (250mL) in 3–4h is also feasible. Anticipated preparation of the admixtures in infusion bag is possible with a stability of 24h.(AU)

Introducción: La infusión intravenosa prolongada de beta-lactámicos aumenta la velocidad de curación clínica comparada con la administración convencional en pacientes críticos o sépticos. Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar la estabilidad química y la compatibilidad física de meropenem en condiciones utilizadas en la práctica clínica para evaluar la estabilidad de la preparación durante su administración y la posibilidad de la preparación anticipada. Métodos: Las mezclas en estudio fueron: (I) meropenem 6g en cloruro sódico 0,9% (SN) en infusor de 2mL/h 50 mL o 10mL/h 240mL; (iii) meropenem 1 o 2g en SN en bolsa de infusión de 250mL. Las temperaturas de estudio fueron: (i) infusor: 4,5°C, 32°C o 12h a 4,5°c seguido de 32°C; (ii) bolsa de infusión: 4,5°C, 24,5°C o 6h a 4,5°c seguido de 24,5°C. El tiempo de estudio fue de 5-6 días en infusor y 1 día en bolsa de infusión. Se evaluó la estabilidad química mediante cromatografía líquida de alta resolución y la compatibilidad física por medida de pH e inspección visual. Resultados: La estabilidad química y la compatibilidad física de meropenem en las mezclas en infusores disminuyeron al aumentar la concentración de meropenem y la temperatura. Las mezclas en bolsas de infusión mostraron estabilidad química y compatibilidad física durante al menos 1 día. Conclusión: La administración de meropenem 6g en infusión de 24h en 240 mL de cloruro sódico 0,9% en infusor de 10ml/h podría ser posible si la mezcla es administrada a 4,5°C. La infusión extendida de 1 o 2g en cloruro sódico 0,9% en bolsa de infusión (250 mL) en 3-4h es también viable. Puede realizarse la preparación anticipada de mezclas de meropenem en bolsas de infusión con una estabilidad de 1 día.(AU)

Bloodstream Infections in Children With Cancer: Pathogen Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns Over a 10-Year Period.

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) adversely affect clinical outcome in children with cancer. Over 1 decade, this retrospective cohort study describes pathogen distribution in BSIs and antimicrobial susceptibility against empirical antibiotics frequently prescribed in children with cancer. The antibiotic efficacy was evaluated through the determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations for piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem and by disk diffusion for remaining antibiotics. From 2004 to 2013, 398 BSIs occurred in 196 children with cancer (median age: 5.4 y), resulting in 457 bacteria. Overall, 266 (58.2%) were Gram-positive, and 191 (41.8%) were Gram-negative with a significant Gram-positive increase over time (P=0.032). Coagulase-negative staphylococci (74, 16.2%), viridans group streptococci (67, 14.7%), Escherichia coli (52, 11.4%), and Staphylococcus aureus (39, 8.5%) were the most common pathogens. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam (95.9%, P=0.419) and meropenem (98.9%, P=0.752) was stable over time, and resistance was observed among viridans group streptococci against piperacillin-tazobactam (18%) and meropenem (7%) and among Enterobacterales against piperacillin-tazobactam (3%). Vancomycin showed 98% Gram-positive activity, gentamicin 82% Gram-negative activity and ampicillin, cefotaxime, and cefuroxime were active in 50%, 72%, and 69% of pathogens, respectively, and BSI-related mortality was 0%. In conclusion, over 1 decade, we report an increase in Gram-positive BSIs, and stable, low-resistance rates against currently recommended empirical antibiotics, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem.

Conceptual model of adding antibiotics to dialysate fluid during renal replacement therapy.

Studies have shown significant variability in antibiotic trough concentrations in critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT). The purpose of this study was to assess whether adding beta-lactam antibiotics to dialysate solution can maintain stable antibiotic concentrations during RRT in experimental conditions. A single compartment model reflecting the patient was constructed and connected to the RRT machine. Dialysate fluid was prepared in three different concentrations of meropenem (0 mg/L; 16 mg/L; 64 mg/L). For each dialysate concentration various combinations of dialysate and blood flow rates were tested by taking different samples. Meropenem concentration in all samples was calculated using spectrophotometry method. Constructed experimental model results suggest that decrease in blood meropenem concentration can be up to 35.6%. Moreover, experimental data showed that antibiotic loss during RRT can be minimized and stable plasma antibiotic concentration can be achieved with the use of a 16 mg/L Meropenem dialysate solution. Furthermore, increasing meropenem concentration up to 64 mg/L is associated with an increase antibiotic concentration up to 18.7-78.8%. Administration of antibiotics to dialysate solutions may be an effective method of ensuring a constant concentration of antibiotics in the blood of critically ill patients receiving RRT.

Impact of an electronic alert on prescription patterns of meropenem, voriconazole and caspofungin.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs promote the appropriate use of antimicrobial substances through the implementation of evidence-based, active and passive interventions. We analyzed the effect of a computer-assisted intervention on antimicrobial use in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016 we introduced an electronic alert for patients being prescribed meropenem, voriconazole and caspofungin. At prescription and at day 3 of treatment, physicians were informed about the risk related to these antimicrobial substances by an electronic alert in the medical records. Physicians were invited to revoke or confirm the prescription and to contact the infectious disease (ID) team. Using interrupted time series regression, the days of therapy (DOTs) and the number of prescriptions before and after the intervention were compared. RESULTS: We counted 64,281 DOTs for 5549 prescriptions during 4100 hospital stays. Overall, the DOTs decreased continuously over time. An additional benefit of the alert could not be observed. Similarly, the number of prescriptions decreased over time, without significant effect of the intervention. When considering the three drugs separately, the alert impacted the duration (change in slope of DOTs/1000 bed days; P = 0.0017) as well as the number of prescriptions (change in slope of prescriptions/1000 bed days; P < 0.001) of voriconazole only. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the alert lowered prescriptions of voriconazole only. Thus, self-stewardship alone seems to have a limited impact on electronic prescriptions of anti-infective substances. Additional measures such as face-to-face prompting with ID physicians or audit and feedback are indispensable to optimize antimicrobial use.

Elution and Biomechanical Properties of Meropenem-Loaded Bone Cement.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical and elution properties of meropenem-loaded bone cement. METHODS: Bone cement (Palacos LV) with 5% (2 g/4 0g), 10% (4 g/40 g), and 15% (6 g/40 g) meropenem; 5% (2 g/40 g) and 10% (4 g/40 g) vancomycin; and blank bone cement were prepared in a total of six groups named A2, A4, A6, B2, B4, and A0 (antibiotic-free). 36 cylinder specimens (6-mm diameter and 12-mm height) of all six groups were molded for a compression test. After the compression test, because of mechanical properties below the ISO standard requirements, groups B2, B4 were not subjected to a bending test. So a total of 24 rectangular strip specimens (10-mm width, 75-mm length, and 3.3-mm thickness) for groups A2, A4, A6 and A0 were molded for the bending test. Between-group differences of compressive strength, bending strength and bending modulus were analyzed. The meropenem standard was prepared as a series of standard solutions to calculate the standard curve. At a constant temperature of 37 °C, separately, meropenem-loaded bone cement cylinder specimens (12 mm in diameter and 17 mm in length) of A2, A4 and A6 were serially immersed in saline solution without stirring. The eluent drug concentration at 24, 48, 72 h and 6, 12, 24 days was measured and the drug concentration-time curve of meropenem was constructed. RESULTS: With the exception of groups B2 and B4, all cements compressive strength values were well above the minimum requirement of the ISO 5833 standard (70 MPa). The compressive strength and bending strength values of group A4 were higher than those of group A0 (P < 0.05), but no difference was found between the A0, A2 and A6 groups (P > 0.05). There were no intergroup differences of bending modulus between the A0, A2, A4 and A6 groups (P > 0.05). A standard curve of meropenem was obtained and a regression equation was constructed: Y = 15.0265 X + 13.5218, r = 1.00. At 37 °C, the release of meropenem was rapid during the first 48 h for all A2, A4, A6 samples, and subsequent release continued to decrease. CONCLUSION: When adding up to 15% (6 g/40 g) meropenem to the bone cement, the biomechanical properties were not reduced, and bone cement with 10% (4 g/40 g) meropenem had the best performance. At a constant temperature of 37°C, meropenem can be released from bone cement for up to 24 days.

Factors associated with the appropriate use of ultra-broad spectrum antibiotics, meropenem, for suspected healthcare-associated pneumonia.

ABSTRACT: Pneumonia is a common disease-causing hospitalization. When a healthcare-associated infection is suspected, antibiotics that provide coverage for multi-drug resistant (MDR) or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) bacteria are frequently prescribed. Limited data is available for guidance on using meropenem as a first-line empiric antimicrobial in hospitalized patients with risk factors for MDR/ESBL bacterial infections.This was a single-center, retrospective study designed and conducted to identify factors associated with positive cultures for MDR/ESBL pathogens in hospitalized patients with suspected healthcare-associated pneumonia.Of the 246 patients, 103 patients (41%) received meropenem. Among patients prescribed meropenem, MDR/ESBL pathogens were detected in only 20 patients (13%). Patients admitted from a skilled nursing facility/long-term acute care (SNF/LTAC) or with a history of a positive culture for MDR/ESBL pathogens were significantly associated with positive cultures of MDR/ESBL pathogens during the hospitalization (odds ratio [95% confidence intervals], 31.40 [5.20-189.6] in SNF/LTAC and 18.50 [2.98-115.1] in history of culture-positive MDR/ESBL pathogen). There was no significant difference in mortality between the 3 antibiotic groups.Admission from a SNF/LTAC or having a history of cultures positive for MDR/ESBL pathogens were significantly associated with a positive culture for MDR/ESBL pathogens during the subsequent admission. We did not detect significant association between meropenem use as a first-line drug and morbidity and mortality for patients admitted to the hospital with suspected healthcare-associated pneumonia, and further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm our findings.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients: How to Achieve Best Dosage Regimen According to the Clinical Situation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Meropenem is frequently used for the treatment of severe bacterial infections in critically ill patients. Because critically ill patients are more prone to pharmacokinetic variability than other patients, ensuring an effective blood concentration can be complex. Therefore, describing this variability to ensure a proper use of this antibiotic drug limits the rise and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance, and helps preserve the current antibiotic arsenal. The aims of this study were to describe the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients, to identify and quantify the patients' characteristics responsible for the observed pharmacokinetic variability, and to perform different dosing simulations in order to determine optimal individually adapted dosing regimens. METHODS: A total of 58 patients hospitalized in the medical intensive care unit and receiving meropenem were enrolled, including 26 patients with renal replacement therapy. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed (using NONMEM software) and Monte Carlo simulations were performed with different dosing scenarios (bolus-like, extended, and continuous infusion) exploring the impact of clinical categories of residual diuresis (anuria, oliguria, and preserved diuresis) on the probability of target attainment (MIC: 1-45 mg/L). RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic model included five covariates with a significant impact on clearance: glomerular filtration rate, dialysis (continuous and semi-continuous), renal function status, and volume of residual diuresis. The clearance for a typical patient in our population is 4.20 L/h and volume of distribution approximately 44 L. Performed dosing regimen simulations suggested that, for equivalent doses, the continuous infusion mode (with loading dose) allowed the obtaining of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target for a larger number of patients (100% for MIC ≤ 20 mg/L). Nevertheless, for the treatment of susceptible bacteria (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L), differences in the probability of target attainment between bolus-like, extended, and continuous infusions were negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Identified covariates in the model are easily accessible information in patient health records. The model highlighted the importance of considering the patient's overall condition (renal function and dialysis) and the pathogen's characteristics (MIC target) during the establishment of a patient's dosing regimen.

Optimal loading dose of meropenem before continuous infusion in critically ill patients: a simulation study.

The aim of this study was to investigate optimal loading doses prior to continuous infusion of meropenem in critically ill patients. A previously published and successfully evaluated pharmacokinetic model of critically ill patients was used for stochastic simulations of virtual patients. Maintenance doses administered as continuous infusion of 1.5-6 g/24 h with preceding loading doses (administered as 30 min infusion) of 0.15-2 g were investigated. In addition to the examination of the influence of individual covariates, a best-case and worst-case scenario were simulated. Dosing regimens were considered adequate if the 5th percentile of the concentration-time profile did not drop at any time below four times the S/I breakpoint (= 2 mg/L) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa according to the EUCAST definition. Low albumin concentrations, high body weight and high creatinine clearances increased the required loading dose. A maximum loading dose of 0.33 g resulted in sufficient plasma concentrations when only one covariate showed extreme values. If all three covariates showed extreme values (= worst-case scenario), a loading dose of 0.5 g was necessary. Higher loading doses did not lead to further improvements of target attainment. We recommend the administration of a loading dose of 0.5 g meropenem over 30 min immediately followed by continuous infusion.

Brain abscess due to listeria monocytogenes: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Listeria monocytogenes infective encephalitis is a rare phenomenon, which is more common in people with changed eating habits and immunodeficiency. To the best of our knowledge, listeria brain abscess is even more rare. In this case report, we summarized the clinical characteristics of listeria brain abscess, in order to explore the diagnosis and treatment of Listeria brain abscess, and raise awareness and attention to the disease. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 64-years-old female patient presented to our institution with 4 days of right arm and leg weakness, the salient past history of the patient was nephrotic syndrome, membranous nephropathy diagnosed 6 months prior, for which she was prescribed glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide. DIAGNOSIS: Listeria monocytogenes was cultured in the blood of the patient. Comprehensive medical history and imaging features, she was diagnosed as listeria brain abscess. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent ampicillin combined with meropenem but not surgery. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered without complications. At a 3-month follow-up visit, the condition was better than that before treatment. LESSONS: Listeria brain abscess is an unusual form of listeriosis, its clinical manifestations lack specificity. Early accurate diagnosis and standardized treatment can effectively promote the recovery of neurological function as well as reduce the morbidity and mortality and improve the prognosis.

Campylobacter fetus bacteremia and meningitis in an acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient undergoing maintenance therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Campylobacter fetus is an uncommon Campylobacter species, and its infections mainly cause infective endocarditis, aortic aneurysm, and meningitis rather than enteritis. It is more likely to be detected in blood than Campylobacter jejuni or Campylobacter coli, specifically reported in 53% of patients. In our case, C. fetus was detected in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old woman, who was on maintenance chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), presented to our clinic with chief complaints of severe headache and nausea. Blood and CSF cultures revealed C. fetus. We administrated meropenem 2 g intravenously (IV) every 8 h for 3 weeks, and she was discharged without neurological sequelae. CONCLUSION: We encountered a case of C. fetus meningitis without gastrointestinal symptoms, neck stiffness or jolt accentuation in a patient with ALL. Undercooked beef was considered the source of C. fetus infection in this case, suggesting that the need for a neutropenic diet and safe food handling be considered.

Effect of combined colistin and meropenem against meropenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by checkerboard method: A cross sectional analytical study.

BACKGROUND: Meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the two most common nosocomial pathogens causing ventilator-associated pneumonia. To combat this resistance, different combinations of antibiotics have been evaluated for their efficacy in laboratories as well as in clinical situations. AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of combined colistin and meropenem against meropenem-resistant isolates of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa by checkerboard method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty meropenem-resistant isolates of A. baumannii (n = 25) and P. aeruginosa (n = 25) from endotracheal aspirates were studied. The MIC of colistin and meropenem was found using the microbroth dilution method. The fractional inhibitory concentration was calculated for the combination of antibiotics by checkerboard assay and the antibiotic interactions were assessed. Fisher's exact test was carried out for statistical comparison of categorical variables. RESULTS: A synergistic effect between colistin and meropenem was observed in 18/25 (72%) and 6/25 (24%) isolates of Acinetobacter baumannnii and P. Aeruginosa, respectively, with fractional inhibitory concentration indices of ≤0.5. None of the tested isolates exhibited antagonism. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that combinations of colistin and meropenem are associated with improvement in minimum inhibitory concentration and may be a promising strategy in treating meropenem-resistant A. baumannii respiratory tract infections.

Glutathione-Conjugated Hydrogels: Flexible Vehicles for Personalized Treatment of Bacterial Infections.

PURPOSE: Skin and soft tissue infections are increasingly prevalent and often complicated by potentially fatal therapeutic hurdles, such as poor drug perfusion and antibiotic resistance. Delivery vehicles capable of versatile loading may improve local bioavailability and minimize systemic toxicities yet such vehicles are not clinically available. Therefore, we aimed to expand upon the use of glutathione-conjugated poly(ethylene glycol) GSH-PEG hydrogels beyond protein delivery and evaluate the ability to deliver traditional therapeutic molecules. METHODS: PEG and GSH-PEG hydrogels were prepared using ultraviolet light (UV)-polymerization. Hydrogel loading and release of selected drug candidates was examined using UV-visible spectrometry. Therapeutic molecules and GST-fusion protein loading was examined using UV-visible and fluorescent spectrometry. Efficacy of released meropenem was assessed against meropenem-sensitive and -resistant P. aeruginosa in an agar diffusion bioassay. RESULTS: For all tested agents, GSH-PEG hydrogels demonstrated time-dependent loading whereas PEG hydrogels did not. GSH-PEG hydrogels released meropenem over 24 h. Co-loading of biologic and traditional therapeutics into a single vehicle was successfully demonstrated. Meropenem-loaded GSH-PEG hydrogels inhibited the growth of meropenem-sensitive and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. CONCLUSION: GSH ligands within GSH-PEG hydrogels allow loading and effective delivery of charged therapeutic agents, in addition to biologic therapeutics.

Continuous Infusion of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Meropenem in ICU Patients Without Renal Dysfunction: Are Patients at Risk of Underexposure?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Morbidity and mortality from serious infections are common in intensive care units (ICUs). The appropriateness of the antibiotic treatment is essential to combat sepsis. We aimed to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam administered at standard total daily dose as continuous infusion in critically ill patients without renal dysfunction and to identify risk factors of non-pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. RESULTS: We included 118 patients (149 concentrations), 47% had microorganism isolation. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [median (interquartile range, IQR) values in isolated pathogens were: meropenem: 0.05 (0.02-0.12) mg/l; piperacillin: 3 (1-4) mg/l]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments (100%fCss≥1xMIC, 100%fCss≥4xMIC and 100%fCss ≥ 8xMIC, respectively) were: 100%, 96.15%, 96.15% (meropenem) and 95.56%, 91.11%, 62.22% (piperacillin) for actual MIC; 98.11%, 71.70%, 47.17% (meropenem, MIC 2 mg/l), 95.83%, 44.79%, 6.25% (piperacillin, MIC 8 mg/l), 83.33%, 6.25%, 1.04% (piperacillin, MIC 16 mg/l) for EUCAST breakpoint of Enterobacteriaceae spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Multivariable linear analysis identified creatinine clearance (CrCL) as a predictive factor of free antibiotic concentrations (fCss) of both therapies (meropenem [ß = - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to - 0.0; p = 0.043)] and piperacillin [ß = - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.01, p < 0.001)]). Neurocritical status was associated with lower piperacillin fCss [ß = - 0.36 (95% CI - 0.61 to - 0.11; p = 0.005)]. CONCLUSION: Standard total daily dose of meropenem allowed achieving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments in ICU patients without renal dysfunction. Higher doses of piperacillin/tazobactam would be needed to cover microorganisms with MIC > 8 mg/l. CrCL was the most powerful factor predictive of fCss in both therapies.

Advances in novel antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to public health and an increasingly common problem for acute care physicians to confront. Several novel antibiotics have been approved in the past decade to combat these infections; however, physicians may be unfamiliar with how to appropriately utilize them. The purpose of this review is to evaluate novel antibiotics active against resistant gram-negative bacteria and highlight clinical information regarding their use in the acute care setting. This review focuses on novel antibiotics useful in the treatment of infections caused by resistant gram-negative organisms that may be seen in the acute care setting. These novel antibiotics include ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilistatin/relebactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, eravacycline, and omadacycline. Acute care physicians should be familiar with these novel antibiotics so they can utilize them appropriately.

Drug dosing using estimated glomerular filtration rate: Misclassification due to metamizole interference in a creatinine assay.

BACKGROUND: The estimated glomerular filtration rate is a rather important measurement for patients under intensive care, since they often receive several drugs, and impaired renal function may result in misleading dosing. The estimated glomerular filtration is derived from mathematical models using serum creatinine, a measurement that suffers interference of some drugs, such as metamizole. This study intended to evaluate the impact on patient stratification for dose adjustment of two antimicrobials (meropenem and vancomycin) caused by metamizole interference in creatinine measurement by dry chemistry. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a group of 108 hospitalized patients under metamizole prescriptions at fixed intervals. Serum creatinine concentrations were determined by enzymatic dry chemistry and Jaffé assays, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated through the CKD-EPI equation. Patients were stratified in groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate for drug dosing of vancomycin and meropenem. RESULTS: Creatinine values were significantly lower in measurements performed by the dry chemistry method in comparison to Jaffé assay (P < 0.0001) when patients are under metamizole treatment. A significant bias (-40.3%) was observed between those two methods, leading to a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in patient classification according to renal function using the CKD-EPI equation for dosing adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: During the validity of metamizole treatment, the stratification for drug dosing by the estimated glomerular filtration rate is not reliable if the creatinine measurement is done through dry chemistry. Clinical and laboratory staff must be aware of these limitations and cooperate to optimize pharmacotherapy.